.
Feedback

Blog | Malibu Lagoon Project Has Little Impact on Bird Population

The project has had no effect upon the birds in the main lagoon or on the beach.

There have been many statements, conjectures, guesswork and accusations about how the Malibu Lagoon Restoration and Enhancement Project was going to kill all the birds, how they are all gone, and so on.

I, and other members of Santa Monica Bay Audubon Society (SMBAS), have censused the lagoon's bird population monthly for over 30 years. We began reporting our monthly census results on our chapter blog in January 2009.


Three months of comparitive data are presented below: one month (May) prior to the project onset, and two months during the project. We'll continue reporting this data on the SMBAS permanent blog project page until sometime after the project is finished.

If it seems like there are fewer birds now than before the project, you're right. That's why we compare June-to-other-Junes, not June-to-December. May and June are low points of the year for birds counts at the lagoon because most birds fly off to breed in places like Alaska. Numbers and diversity pick up a bit in July, peak in January - March, and then begin to drop off again.

Our interim conclusion is that, so far, the project is having no significant effect on species diversity and total population of the lagoon (which always includes Surfrider Beach) as a whole. The west channels area, as bad as it currently looks, still has a few birds foraging in it, at least on weekends when no one is working. West channel area birdlife on July 22 was not greatly different from that of May 27, despite the greatly altered appearance.

Total birds and species diversity numbers fluctuate, as always, but the main lagoon birdlife is essentially unaffected by the project.

Bird Census Comparisons by Month (see below)
I am able to squeeze in 10 years of data for the summaries.
Types of Birds
Waterfowl: Geese, ducks
Water Birds-Other: Loons, grebes, shearwater. cormorants, pelican, rail, coot
Herons & Egrets: Heron, egrets, night-heron, Ibis
Raptors: Vulture, osprey, hawks, falcons
Shorebirds: Plovers, oystercatcher, stilt, avocet, sandpipers, phalaropes
Gulls & Terns: Gulls, terns, skimmer, jaeger, guillemot
Doves: Pigeons, doves
Other Non-Pass: Parakeet, swifts, Hummingbirds, Kingfisher, Woodpeckers
Passerines: All "songbirds" - flycatcher, swallow, wren, crow, warbler, sparrow, blackbird, finch, etc.

*********************
The May 2012 report on our SMBAS blog has species sighting details for the most recent six years.
Comment on May 2012: total birds slightly (15%) above average; species diversity average. Project started a few days later.

Malibu Census 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012
Totals by Type 5/25 5/23 5/22 5/28 5/27 5/25 5/24 5/23 5/22 5/27 Ave. Waterfowl 30 11 23 44 57 38 38 37 51 42 37 Water Birds-Other 110 27 323 179 668 252 132 148 152 313 230 Herons & Egrets 12 13 7 7 26 25 13 16 6 23 15 Raptors 0 3 1 2 1 1 1 1 3
1 Shorebirds 99 37 44 39 10 1 5 5 5 51 30 Gulls & Terns 356 165 147 160 235 148 144 216 51 151 177 Doves 5 10 6 7 12 2 10 12 9 5 8 Other Non-Pass. 6 8 5 5 15 4 10 7 5 8 7 Passerines 77 195 137 74 176 139 79 106 131 127 124 Totals Birds 695 469 693 517 1200 610 432 548 413 720 630
2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012
Total Species 5/25 5/23 5/22 5/28 5/27 5/25 5/24 5/23 5/22 5/27 Ave. Waterfowl 5 3 2 2 4 4 4 3 2 4 3 Water Birds-Other 6 4 4 5 5 6 5 7 3 4 5 Herons & Egrets 2 4 4 3 4 4 4 3 3 4 4 Raptors 0 2 1 1 1 1 1 1 3 0 1 Shorebirds 9 3 6 6 3 1 2 2 2 6 4 Gulls & Terns 9 8 9 7 7 9 7 6 6 7 8 Doves 2 2 1 2 3 1 2 2 2 3 2 Other Non-Pass. 4 4 2 3 3 2 2 2 2 3 3 Passerines 19 21 19 18 17 19 16 19 16 16 18 Totals Species 56 51 48 47 47 47 43 45 39 47 47

*******************************
The original June 2012 on our SMBAS blog has species sighting details for the most recent six years. No June census done in 2003 or 2008.
Comment on June 2012:
  total birds well (60%) above average (high numbers of Brown Pelican & Elegant Tern); species diversity slightly (11%) below average.

Malibu Census 2001 2002 2004 2005 2006 2007 2009 2010 2011 2012
Totals by Type 6/24 6/23 6/27 6/26 6/25 6/24 6/28 6/27 6/26 6/24 Ave. Waterfowl 20 16 28 27 39 62 41 62 46 26 36.7 Water Birds-Other 29 98 86 95 31 271 117 217 97 368 140.9 Herons & Egrets 7 14 27 9 12 24 28 28 19 5 17.3 Raptors 0 2 3 1 0 2 3 1 4 1 1.7 Shorebirds 2 18 27 56 25 3 9 2 7 25 17.4 Gulls & Terns 157 95 168 85 333 433 139 105 96 373 198.4 Doves 32 10 7 8 10 4 10 8 9 4 10.2 Other Non-Pass. 1 9 5 3 3 2 6 3 2 12 4.6 Passerines 123 155 97 77 94 96 93 220 122 49 112.6 Totals Birds 371 417 448 361 547 897 446 646 402 863 539.8
2001 2002 2004 2005 2006 2007 2009 2010 2011 2012   Total Species 6/24 6/23 6/27 6/26 6/25 6/24 6/28 6/27 6/26 6/24 Ave. Waterfowl 1 1 1 2 3 5 3 4 2 2 2.4 Water Birds-Other 3 6 5 6 4 6 4 4 4 5 4.7 Herons & Egrets 4 5 4 4 3 6 4 4 5 2 4.1 Raptors 0 2 3 1 0 2 3 1 3 1 1.6 Shorebirds 1 5 6 6 2 1 3 1 2 4 3.1 Gulls & Terns 4 10 5 5 8 6 5 7 6 5 6.1 Doves 2 2 2 2 2 1 2 2 2 2 1.9 Other Non-Pass. 1 3 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 3 2.1 Passerines 14 18 17 16 14 15 16 15 19 13 15.7 Totals Species 30 52 45 44 38 44 42 40 45 37 41.7

*******************************
The original July 2012 on our SMBAS blog has species sighting details for the most recent six years. No July census done in 2002 or 2008.
Comment on July 2012: total birds slightly (14%) below average (low number of Brown Pelican); species diversity slightly (11%) above average.

Malibu Census 2001 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2009 2010 2011 2012
Totals by Type 7/22 7/27 7/25 7/24

7/23

7/22

7/26

7/25

7/24

7/22

Ave.

Waterfowl 30 22 20 15 73 62 26 58 56 49 41.1 Water Birds-Other 75 85 103 15 47 128 81 227 463 57 128.1 Herons & Egrets 31 23 23 12 47 28 50 28 32 13 28.7 Raptors 2 3 1 1 2 2 1 1 0 1 1.4 Shorebirds 33 9 35 163 22 23 4 127 32 128 57.6 Gulls & Terns 371 148 457 113 123 140 44 306 175 161 203.8 Doves 46 10 10 2 2 8 3 10 9 4 10.4 Other Non-Pass. 8 8 14 0 4 7 5 7 6 10 6.9 Passerines 594 95 117 114 99 121 95 152 167 133 168.7 Totals Birds 1190 403 780 435 419 519 309 916 940 556 646.7 Malibu Census 2001 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2009 2010 2011 2012   Total Species 7/22 7/27 7/25 7/24

7/23

7/22

7/26

7/25

7/24

7/22

Ave.

Waterfowl 1 1 1 1 3 2 2 3 2 4 2.0 Water Birds-Other 5 5 5 5 5 5 4 4 5 4 4.7 Herons & Egrets 5 5 4 4 5 5 4 4 4 3 4.3 Raptors 2 2 1 1 2 2 1 1 0 1 1.3 Shorebirds 9 2 12 9 4 7 4 10 8 11 7.6 Gulls & Terns 6 6 9 5 7 6 3 9 8 7 6.6 Doves 2 2 2 1 1 2 3 2 2 2 1.9 Other Non-Pass. 3 3 2 0 2 2 3 2 2 2 2.1 Passerines 17 19 15 11 13 18 16 16 19 18 16.2 Totals Species 50 45 51 37 42 49 40 51 50 52 46.7

*******************************

Newsletter & Alerts

Get the best stories each day and important breaking news

Subscribe

Not from Malibu Patch? Find your Local Patch »

Loading comments ...
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors. Write a new post... What's up? Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell something
Sulah cat May 20, 2013 at 07:49 pm
For those of you who are hyperventilating over the cost of the lagoon restoration I suggest youRead More consult the state coastal conservancy website. Apparently there was approx. eight million dollars available for the lagoon restoration project. That includes the cost of the lagoon itself, the cost of the parking lot, over a million dollars for the EIR and the cost of five years of monitoring upon completion of the project as well as other expenses. That figure was made known to some of you out there who now feign ignorance. Mrs. Hanscom's 12-30 million dollar figure is ludicrous and an outright lie and she knows it and so do many others. She lies people, she LIES! They may wind up spending less than the eight million so stay tuned.Purrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrr.
M Stanley May 20, 2013 at 11:53 am
Forget the "proponents" of the project - where is an official spokesperson for CA StateRead More Parks that will speak on behalf of the project and provide actual answers?
Sulah cat May 20, 2013 at 11:12 am
I have no idea,Andy, what the final cost will be. The proponents of the restoration suggest no moreRead More than seven million dollars and I have no reason to disbelieve them. I suspect whatever the number proves to be you will find fault with it since tour apparent distrust of government seems so pervasive. Puuuuuuuuuuuuuur.
David Armstead May 20, 2013 at 01:26 pm
the People of Malibu better wake up! this issue with Paradise Cove is only going to get worse. TheRead More city and Paradise Cove are working on an expansion of the parking there. See the link to a recent meeting at the city that is the beginning of Paradise coves expansion. It is very quiet and no one knows but look at the plan. Currently Paradise Cove does not have the proper Zoning to be doing what they do down there. The city thinks by letting them expand that it will get people off the highway so they are in favor but in reality it only puts more money into the pockets of Paradise Cove and people will still park on PCH and Paradise Cove will continue to sends drunks out onto the road to endanger all of us. Speak up! http://www.malibucity.org/download/index.cfm/fuseaction/download/cid/20457/
webecool May 20, 2013 at 03:26 pm
I ate lunch Friday at the Adamson House lawn and nearly 'chuncked out' with the smell of sewage.Read More Uggggg! It was worse than the biggest sewage spill that Paradise Cove ever had in the 15 years living there. I'm not a scientist like everyone else who has been arguing about this project but I know the smell of 8hit when I smell it. Something is seriously wrong. I am a mechanical engineer and it seems to me that all the scientists and smart designers have not taken into account any fluid dynamics. Water flows in, water flows out....water flows through. How hard is that? It seems to me they have designed what is called turbulence!
steve dunn May 19, 2013 at 04:43 pm
All I get on this blog is an ad for verizon
Jessica E. Davis (Editor) May 17, 2013 at 03:51 pm
Love that you are using the message board to ask this question. Does any one have any ideas?
M Stanley May 16, 2013 at 01:33 pm
Thank you for the information Jessica!
Jessica E. Davis (Editor) May 15, 2013 at 05:54 pm
Also, first make sure you are signed in, and if you can't go to the reset password link here:Read More http://malibu.patch.com/forgot_password.
Max May 15, 2013 at 11:03 am
Dear Phil (re: Burt's column), I can’t quite put my finger on it, but, I sense anRead More Eggs-itential undertone to all this. Does the chicken Egg-ist on behalf of the egg or vice versa? Eggs-perience will reveal the truth. To be complete, I must rehash Camus’ “The Play-egg.” Yet, as I recall, in the Book of Eggs-odous, there wasn’t a single Play-egg, but ten of them… so many, in fact, that it seems to many readers to be literally a Dozen Play-eggs. But, then again, I’m not very religious. In fact, many of my colleagues take me for an Egg-nostic. But, they are such Hard-boiled fanatics, that, in fact, their peers surmise they boarder on Egg-lectic. But, as Burt always says in da ‘hood, “Om-letting them be what they want to be.” We, however, have one on Burt: Rumor has it that he fell of the Vegan and had an egg salad… to which he Eggs-claims, “It was a serving of ‘Egg Beaters,’ you Egg-Heads!!”
Jessica E. Davis (Editor) May 14, 2013 at 10:27 pm
From my family: McCluckens
Susan Tellem May 14, 2013 at 07:35 pm
Call them Nuggets, Fricassee, Kiev, Marsala and Enchilada because that's what chickens end up as onRead More the dinner plate. Just sayin'.
TheDr. May 2, 2013 at 11:26 pm
But autumn in old town around Farmington Rd and Grand River is nice as is the season anywhere inRead More Michigan..I love California and the years I lived there.
J. Flo April 27, 2013 at 02:21 am
May Malibu residents, businesses and our City ALWAYS have the foresight and passion to remember andRead More protect > "Malibu was a place I went to with friends to hang out at the beach. But the last few years, its become a place I often go to by myself as a little escape zone. Whenever I have need to clear by head and level my shoulders, I head out to Malibu for a little mini-vacation. Whenever, like Ishmael, it feels like a damp, drizzly November in my soul, I fire up my 1965 Chevelle Malibu Super Sport and go see the watery part of the world." Amen.
Darcy Miller April 27, 2013 at 12:43 am
I'm from Farmington, MI and I live in Calabasas now, off Mulholland Highway, for the same reason.Read More Beauty all around...
Sulah cat May 16, 2013 at 03:18 pm
MT-------still engaging in blatant hyperbole. Aldo Leopold van de Hoeck is not! Jacques, thanksRead More for the offer but no thanks. You'll just have to do it yourself. It's difficult to respond to a remark that has no sense. Puuuuuuuuuuur
Jacques Mehoff May 3, 2013 at 07:30 pm
I don't know why Sulah Cat would talk about CeCe in such a way, I thought they were friends......
Jessica E. Davis (Editor) May 3, 2013 at 07:24 pm
Thanks all for the love. I think I learned my lesson about taking time off though! It's been a busyRead More week back.
J. Flo April 10, 2013 at 12:51 am
We also use Havahart traps. They are gentle and humane, we can easily transport the little crittersRead More away from our population. We've done this successfully at least 20 times! Shared them with countless Malibu friends who've also successfully and humanely cured their rodent issues.
Maureen Haldeman April 9, 2013 at 02:29 pm
Many complain but do nothing more ... and it is only by action that something gets accomplished. IRead More applaud The Malibu Agricultural Society for persevering on this critical issue and thank the local businesses that removed the rat poison from their shelves. We really can all make a difference. Thank you!
Cece Stein April 9, 2013 at 01:56 pm
Dittos Kian Well said and thanks for your compassion .
J. Flo April 30, 2013 at 02:44 pm
"Although a great many women had entered the men’s room, not a single one emerged."Read More I just choked on my coffee. This might be the funniest thing I've ever read . . .