.
Feedback

Bicycles and You on PCH—Take a Deep Breath

Drivers have many misconceptions about bicyclists.

Nearly a year ago, I was frustrated, as were other Malibuites, about the bicycles on Pacific Coast Highway running red lights and riding three-abreast in the right lane. There were other “infractions” that people wrote letters to the editor about. Anger was building, so I came up with the idea of starting a Facebook page called, “Share the Road, Share the Ticket.” Ouch! What brouhaha ensued! 

Some people in the bicycle community flipped out, and the blog posts flamed red with anger toward me. I took a licking and kept on ticking, bringing my wounds to the Malibu Public Safety Commission of which I am a member. It turns out fellow Commissioners Chris Frost and Carol Randall had tried to fix the bicycle problems in Malibu for a long time too. 

I threw up a white flag and asked the cyclists to have a meeting with me (I was wearing a bicycle helmet and brought my pepper spray). The meeting went well, and from it evolved a bicycle workshop and some great guys I met who have smoothed the way to greater understanding. 

The Public Safety Commission held a public workshop this past Saturday to discuss bicycle safety on PCH. Residents, several City Council members and a number of bicycle club members attended the session. It was an eye opener, and we all learned a lot from each other. Afterward, I asked Eric Bruins who bikes to work in Malibu and who attended Saturday’s workshop, to clarify common misconceptions drivers have about bicyclists and explain what it’s like to ride a bike on PCH. He has a lot of knowledge and is happy to post comments clarifying what bicyclists encounter on PCH. We want to hear from you residents too. Tell us your issues and concerns.

Myth: The white lines running down the right-hand side of the traffic lanes are authorized bike lanes.

Fact: PCH does not have bike lanes in Malibu. The white line, known as the fog line, marks the edge between the travel lane and the shoulder. The shoulder is not considered part of the “roadway,” which is defined as the part of the highway ordinarily used for vehicular travel.

Myth: Bicyclists must stay to the right of the fog line at all times.

Fact: Because the shoulder is not actually part of the “roadway,” bicyclists are not required by law to ride on it, although many do so out of courtesy to motorists. The shoulder is full of debris and other hazards that could put a bicyclist at risk, such as broken glass, gravel, rough pavement or parked cars. Many of these hazards are not readily seen from behind a steering wheel. Parked cars are a particular danger because someone may open the door suddenly into the path of a bicyclist, which could lead to a dangerous collision. Many bicyclists stay three to four feet away from parked cars to avoid risk of winning the “door prize.” Often times, avoiding these hazards requires leaving the shoulder.

Myth: Bicyclists are not allowed to ride in the traffic lanes.

Fact: Bicyclists are given all the rights and responsibilities of drivers of a motor vehicle, including the right to ride on the “roadway” (which we already determined does not include the shoulder). The law requires bicyclists to ride “as far right as practicable” except in a number of situations. One of these situations is when the lane is too narrow for a car and bicycle to safely share a single lane. The travel lanes on PCH are too narrow to share in all but a few places, meaning that a bicyclist in the right lane may ride in the center of it.  This position is safer for everyone because it increases the bicyclist’s visibility and prevents unsafe passing.

Myth: Bicyclists are allowed to go through red lights at T intersections like Big Rock and Kanan if there is no traffic coming.

Fact: Like a car, bicyclists are required to stop at red lights, even at intersections without cross traffic. Many of these T intersections have crosswalks or driveways that could pose a hazard. On the east end of town, residents use the gaps in traffic to get out of their driveways and garages and are not expecting bicyclists to be there after running the red. That said, no bicyclist has caused a collision by running a red at a T intersection on PCH in at least the last decade.

Myth: Bicyclists do not have to stop at stop signs if there is no opposing traffic.

Fact: Again, like a car, bicyclists are required to stop at stop signs. However, there is no requirement in the California Vehicle Code that they put their foot down (another common myth). Also like cars (but not in a good way), bicyclists tend to slow down, make sure there’s no cross traffic, and proceed without coming to a complete stop.  It’s called a California Stop for a reason. The main safety issue arises when anyone one the road—be it a bicyclist or a driver—does not respect the right-of-way of the other person, leading to a potential conflict.

Myth: Bicyclists must use the right-turn lane to stop at a light even if they are going straight in order to stay out of traffic.

Fact: According to the vehicle code, bicyclists are supposed to be in the through lane unless they are turning, just like any other vehicle. Due to the configuration of the shoulder and right turn lanes on PCH, most bicyclists continue on their line instead of merging over into traffic. What seems to work best is for through bicyclists to ride along the left edge of the right-turn lane. Bicyclists must not ride through an intersection from the right side of the right turn lane. This creates a “right hook” conflict between the bicyclist and turning vehicles where the driver turns across the path of the bicyclist. Drivers merging into the turn lane should signal and look for bicyclists in their mirrors and blind spot before turning.

Myth: Bicyclists stay in packs and ride side-by-side because it is safer.

Fact: This is pretty much true. In addition to being social and aerodynamically efficient, riding in a pack increases visibility to drivers—the number one factor in preventing collisions. As we covered above, bicyclists are allowed to ride in the center of a narrow lane at their discretion. Once a bicyclist is in middle of the lane, there is no difference under the law between riding side-by-side and single-file.  Either way, a driver will have to change lanes to pass legally and safely.

Myth: Bicyclists must get out of a car's way if the driver is going faster.

Fact: Just as when approaching a slower car, the responsibility is always on the overtaking driver to pass safely. There is a common belief that bicyclists may not “impede” traffic, however the legal definition is much narrower than most people realize. On a two-lane road, the law requires slower vehicles to use turnouts or safely pull over when five or more cars are behind. On a road like PCH, where there are two lanes in each direction, it is always expected that faster traffic pass using the left lane. If there is another vehicle in the left lane, then one should slow down and merge when it is safe to do so. Drivers: Always, always, always, leave at least three feet between your car and a bicyclist.

Myth: Most bicycle accidents are the bicyclist's fault.

Fact: Of bicycle-vehicle collisions on PCH, three out of four are the driver’s fault according to a 5-year study of traffic data from the California Highway Patrol.  The most common collisions are sideswipes, right hooks and left crosses (turning left across a bicyclist’s path). These are all avoidable if drivers pass with at least three feet of room, signal and remember to check their mirrors and blind spots. The comparatively few collisions that are the bicyclist’s fault are usually when a bicyclist is riding against traffic or intoxicated. Other factors may include riding at night without lights, failing to signal or failing to observe right-of-way.

Myth: Sheriff’s officers do not ticket bicyclists.

Fact: Bicyclists can and do receive citations for vehicle code violations, just like drivers. Sheriff’s officers are required to enforce the law equally, without favoring any one group over another. However, limited resources require that the officers focus their efforts on violations that are most likely to lead to serious collisions, such as speeding, distracted driving, and driving under the influence. As a result, less serious violations, whether by cyclists or drivers, may sometimes be overlooked under some circumstances.

 

Please leave your questions below in the comments section, and our bicycling friend will do his best to answer them.

hellwood March 18, 2012 at 02:23 am
RE:
"billdsd 9:59 pm on Saturday, March 17, 2012 Unfortunately, you just pretend that you already know everything without ever having studied that subject. That's why you can't understand. Let go of your arrogance and do a little studying." Arrogance is when you insult people who disagree. Ignorance is when you cant imagine that other people can be intelligent. We are all still waiting for you to convice all of us that bicycle riding on PCH is safe. Trust me, we are smart enough to listen to your theories and decide for ourselves if they make sense based on our experiences. There are actually some very intelligent people reading who wont listen to your crap because of your insults.
billdsd March 18, 2012 at 02:24 am
You completely fail at understanding the point.
My training in mathematics does not help me understand bicycle safety. It helps me understand mathematics. My training in bicycle safety is why I understand bicycle safety. That was the point. The point that you missed entirely. You have to study a subject in order to understand it.
billdsd March 18, 2012 at 02:26 am
So you haven't studied it at all.
You have to understand how crashes actually happen in the real world and you have to learn techniques for how to prevent them or at least make them dramatically less likely to happen. I've done the homework. You've showed up in class and tried to fake your way through an oral report hoping that nobody noticed that you didn't do the reading.
hellwood March 18, 2012 at 02:30 am
@billdsd
well, your superior math skills sure aren't helping you get your point across
billdsd March 18, 2012 at 02:32 am
They aren't my theories. I didn't invent bicycle safety. I learned it from bicycle safety experts. I have been practicing it for years and between the study and the practice I am quite good at riding safely.
Saying that someone is ignorant of a subject that they clearly have not studied is not so much an insult as an observation. As for the validity of your uniformed opinions: “Anti-intellectualism has been a constant thread winding its way through our political and cultural life, nurtured by the false notion that democracy means that 'my ignorance is just as good as your knowledge.'” ― Isaac Asimov He was talking about political opinions but the theme works for this any many other subjects just as well. Ignorance is not as good as knowledge.
billdsd March 18, 2012 at 02:34 am
Unfortunately your poor reading comprehension is making communication difficult. I'm not sure how I could have stated it more simply. You have to study a subject to understand it. What is so difficult to understand about that?
Steve Woods March 18, 2012 at 02:42 am
Your egotistical arrogance does nothing to solve reality based problems .
hellwood March 18, 2012 at 02:47 am
@billdsd
You think that learning from a book in a classroom makes everybody else that has real life experiences inferior. You need to think about who your audience is. Do you really think that the residents of one of the wealthiest towns in America got here because of their ignorance? Your mathematics analogy just shows us that you think that you are smart because of the books you've read. Us ignorant residents who live on PCH see stupidity beyond belief that they dont teach in classrooms.
hellwood March 18, 2012 at 02:50 am
RE:
"billdsd 10:26 pm on Saturday, March 17, 2012 So you haven't studied it at all. You have to understand how crashes actually happen in the real world..." Oh, I guarantee that anybody that lives here on PCH has seen more accidents happen "in the real world" than you have seen in your classroom
billdsd March 18, 2012 at 03:03 am
The difference between you and me is that I learned from people who analyzed the causes of crashes and their frequency. You just make it up and pretend to know. Do the homework or stop pretending to be an expert. You pretense that you understand bicycle safety without studying it is the ultimate in arrogance.
billdsd March 18, 2012 at 03:06 am
I have over a half a million miles of driving experience in over 32 years of driving and well over 100,000 miles of road bicycling experience. I have plenty of real world experience. However, the experience is not fully understood without knowing the theories. Understanding crashes requires analysis. That something that you haven't done. That analysis is a lot more work than reading the books or taking the classes.
The mathematics thing was just a point about having to study things to understand them.
Brantley Watson March 18, 2012 at 03:47 am
We at Patch always encourage active debate, but it is imperative that any debate remain civil. Any profanity whatsoever will not be permitted on the site. I ask that you please stay on topic and refrain from using offensive language. Thank you.
Goodgulf March 19, 2012 at 12:43 pm
You should be scared to ride on the sidewalk, it's 1 of the two most dangerous riding styles (The other is riding against traffic.). That being said, it's still statistically pretty danged safe.
Goodgulf March 19, 2012 at 12:50 pm
OK, proving your point should be easy them. Check out the FARS database (Just google it, I don't know if I can post links here.) This maintans records for the conditions and locations of every fatality involving autos in the USA. Show us how the fatality rate for cyclists is higher along that stetch of highway. The data is all there.
David Huntsman March 19, 2012 at 06:32 pm
The last few days of conversation where motorists insist on the right to drive a car fast and not change lanes for cyclists on Pacific Coast Highway is analogous to slobs insisting they have the right to foul the pool, even though the law says they can't, and even though other swimmers ask them not to.
"We've been fouling the pool for years, why should we climb out and use the toilet just because it endangers you? If you don't like human waste in the pool, swim elsewhere!"
hellwood March 19, 2012 at 07:06 pm
@david
We have also been talking about how bicycle riders who cant even keep up with the flow of traffic find it necessary to ride out in the middle of the road regardless of how much room they have on the shoulder
David Huntsman March 19, 2012 at 07:11 pm
Yes - I was referring to you.
Goodgulf March 19, 2012 at 07:14 pm
Of course, riding further into the lane (Minimum of 3 feet from the edge of the roadway...not the curb edge or the gutter.) is what every cycling safety organization I am aware of recommends because it's significantly safer than riding to the far right.
hellwood March 19, 2012 at 07:17 pm
@david
You are the minority. I have driven around a million of you. A majority of riders manage to stay out of traffic. So who is really fouling the pool for everybody else?
David Huntsman March 19, 2012 at 07:19 pm
You.
Goodgulf March 19, 2012 at 07:20 pm
David is part of traffic. Get over it.
David Huntsman March 19, 2012 at 07:24 pm
Goodgulf, it looks like hellwood is suggesting the shoulder is relevant. I don't think he's even gotten to the lane sharing issue.
He wants the educated people to "get out of the pool"... These things take time.
hellwood March 19, 2012 at 07:29 pm
The world revolves around you David. Riding in the middle of PCH could save mankind! you ARE the man!
hellwood March 19, 2012 at 07:31 pm
Don't worry goodgulf. You are special too! :)
David Huntsman March 19, 2012 at 07:41 pm
Just doing my bit to preserve western civilization, one public right-of-way at a time...
hellwood March 19, 2012 at 07:47 pm
@david
OK, fine by me. Just don't get yourself killed trying to prove a point
Goodgulf March 19, 2012 at 08:01 pm
If he was trying to get killed, he'd ride on the sidewalk or against traffic. To lesser degree, he'd ride far to the right. But he rides with at least 3' of clearance between himself and the right of the useable lane, as is suggested by cycling safety organizations the world over.
Actually, this is a bit of a misnomer, as even the most dangerous forms of cycling that I list (In decreasing order) there are statistically pretty darned safe.
billdsd March 19, 2012 at 08:05 pm
By riding in the middle of the lane bicyclists make themselves dramatically more visible and make it absolutely clear that it is not possible to pass within the lane. It's completely obvious from hundreds of feet away that you will have to change lanes to pass. That's makes bicyclists safer. It's in all of the safety books and taught in the safety classes. It also works in the real world.
billdsd March 19, 2012 at 08:10 pm
Bicyclists are never required to ride on the shoulder.
Bicyclists are traffic. Why can't you just change lanes? Are all lanes but the slow lane made of red hot lava? Will you have seven years bad luck if you change lanes to pass a bicyclist?
CAROLYN RODIONOFF February 21, 2013 at 07:14 pm
Hi Jamie,
I've read the article (nicely written/well researched) and the comments to what you said. I have had the same question in my mind. I have, to date, lost two friends on that highway, and wish that they had chosen to ride somewhere else. I'm not arguing the political correctness of either side...just saying that PCH, at least in Malibu, is dangerous in a car...I would strongly (and do) urge all I love not to bike on it. They can be right...and still dead :(

Newsletter & Alerts

Get the best stories each day and important breaking news

Subscribe

Not from Malibu Patch? Find your Local Patch »

Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors. Write a new post... What's up? Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell something
Max June 18, 2013 at 09:02 am
Firemen are my true heroes. Not once, but twice, have they saved my house over the years, as wellRead More as where I worked most of my career. We cannot thank them enough for their yeomen efforts and hard work. When they are on the lines, we always provide them with food and drink, which is the least that we can do. We also welcome them when they make their annual inspections of properties here to ensure that homeowners clear their brush. When I was in school, we were visited by Firemen, who handed out badges and booklets on fire safety. I was proud to wear my "Junior Fireman" badge back then, and feel the same today!
Rainbow in Malibu 20112
Yvonne Carrison June 17, 2013 at 09:24 am
Luv the rainbow over our heavenly canyon, we are truly blessed to live here! Gratitude
Snookie Ravioli June 17, 2013 at 08:32 am
I doubt it matters much. The Malibu mayor is no more than the presiding officer of the councilRead More meetings. In a council-manager form of government, which Malibu has, the mayor has very little power--a good thing in Malibu considering its history. The mayor in Malibu is a ceremonial position and s/he has no more actual power than the other council members. The game of musical chairs is not a bad thing in the Malibu council. Consider the alternative!
Snookie Ravioli June 17, 2013 at 08:44 am
A follow-up to Tom Brady's idea of annelected mayor. That woukd require a change in the form ofRead More government in Malibu to a Mayor-Manager form. The Mayor-Manager form is best for larger cities. Most cities the size of Malibu have the Council-Manager form because experience shows it works best for small cities. Having an elected mayor with the power of an elected mayor could create more problems than it solves. It would completely change the political environent in Malibu, and not for the better. Having weak, rotating mayors serves Malibu well.
Dee Rivellino June 17, 2013 at 06:07 pm
How do I explain why we have such a turnover in Mayors.? Because in intelligent communities theRead More answer would sound very pathetic. ..Well, let me start from the beginning when no one on the first, second, third, fourth, etc. Councils could decide how long the Mayor should serve ..so some genius came up with rotation and actually that's ok because all the Mayor does anyway is pose for pictures with the current flock of so called Celebrities. This goes on the list of why Malibu is always so different from other normal town around us.(An article I wrote months ago in the Surfside news) The Council meets, accomplishes little, a new Mayor is selected and life goes on. ... Elected officials(that's a joke too since only less than 3,000 people ever show up to vote out of 13,000 residents).. You can't ask questions like why our Mayor moves like the waves of the Ocean when most of the people in Malibu have no clue whats going on behind those thick doors at City Hall....the ones NOT OPEN TO THE PUBLIC. Good for Burt, its only taken him 18 months to ask the hard questions.
Ted Vaill June 11, 2013 at 12:24 pm
Sounds like a great father, like his son. My father died in 1989, of cancer, but was a happy,Read More positive man to the end. My mother remarried nine years later, and remarked before she died at age 98 that she was blessed to be married to two wonderful men.
Max June 12, 2013 at 01:46 am
Dear Burt, A very toughing piece about your dear father. If only more fathers these days had theRead More values and character that your father had, this world would be a much better, more caring and loving place. I, too, had a father that was very giving and supportive of me. As both of my parents were holocaust survivors, my upbringing was greatly influenced by their horrific experiences in Poland, Czechoslovakia and Germany: losing 80% of our families, being in over a dozen different concentration camps and facing death and torture continuously. It’s amazing that they were able to lead “normal” lives upon immigrating to the US. Never finishing high school in Poland and not speaking a word of English, he attended night school (Fairfax High), worked during the days in the subcontractor business (he manufactured venetian blinds, screens and louver windows, all from scratch, decades before they were imported), became a citizen (as did my late Mom) and raised a family. They eked out a living (lower middle class), sent my younger brother and I to Hebrew school every day after public school classes, encouraged us to strive in school and somehow supported my hobby of being a radio amateur and my brother in violin studies. My parents always wanted me to become an electronics engineer (probably based on the dream my father had before WW2). Several of his proudest moments were when I got accepted into the physics grad schools of Princeton, Harvard, Caltech, Stanford and UCLA; when I received my PhD from Caltech; when I authored a cover feature article in Scientific American; and when I married my Beshert (soul mate). As a kid, I had a mild connection to you, Burt. I loved rulers, be they the fancy compact metallic ones that retracted by the push of a button, the ones that had a mechanical crank to reel in the ruler or the foldable wooden rulers (that I always associated with a magic trick), which I would use in school, the lab and measuring Ham radio antennas that I built as a kid. All this was influenced by my dear father, equipped with rulers of all kinds, which he used on a daily basis when precisely measuring windows and door frames, manufacturing venetian blinds, screen doors, etc. As a 5-year old, my father would take me to his 2-man shop and, as they worked, I would run around the place with various rulers and magnets in tow, measuring everything in sight and picking up nails and hardware. I guess the only difference between us is that you became a ruler and I became one who is ruled. Happy Father’s Day, Burt!
Sandra Peltola June 8, 2013 at 08:14 am
Time to support Vital Zuman Farm, 60 years of service to the community. If you have not been to theRead More farm, you must, before another season goes by! Get your nature on, see the crops growing, meet friends, eat good food, listen to music outdoors, view exceptional art; ALL AT VITAL ZUMAN FARM on Saturday June 22, 2013 from 12:00 noon till 6:00pm. More Info: 310-924-2210
Far Infrared Sauna w/LED Lights
Lisa Knickmeyer, L.Ac., DA June 7, 2013 at 01:05 pm
Endermologie is perfect for the summer! It increases fat cell metabolism, addresses trapped fat andRead More streamlines the body and treats fat resistant to diet and exercise.
Super Dume
Mizzy Pacheco June 7, 2013 at 05:37 pm
Thanks. Moon rise.
Ashley W. Lewis June 9, 2013 at 05:06 pm
Ashley Lewis Thanks for sharing the beautiful photo of the fabulous moon and rocks. Curious whatRead More kind of camera and lens was used?
Mizzy Pacheco June 9, 2013 at 08:29 pm
Thanks, that was taken with a canon 5d mark ii with the cannon f4 70-200mm set at about 125mm
Lois Livoti June 5, 2013 at 03:52 pm
Wow - how fantastic to see Jim Palmer's Malibu Vineyards on the map for world class wine making.Read More Also I want to congratulate you on your recent "Best of Class" award and 95 point rating from the Los Angeles International wine competition for your 2010 Malibu Vineyards Estate Syrah. Well done!!!!
kim devane June 6, 2013 at 10:15 am
Well done Jim! You are putting Malibu on the map for world class wine. Congratulations! kim &Read More larry
This sycamore tree on Trancas Canyon Road was six inches -- and five votes -- away from getting ground up to make way for four more unsafe, angle parking places on Trancas Canyon Rd. Now, can we get rid of the numbskull loading zone at PCH's corner?
J. Flo June 4, 2013 at 02:11 pm
I found the meeting, the speakers and the Planning Commission to be very impressive. Well-thoughtRead More out, intelligent.
Hans Laetz June 4, 2013 at 07:33 pm
So interesting to hear the applicant's lawyer explain that the billboard was appropriate becauseRead More "this is a commercial area." Oh, dear dear dear. That sort of explains the whole problem.
Proud Elitist June 10, 2013 at 06:54 am
First the Paige Sports Arena sign at Univ Missouri Columbia comes down. Next Trancas sign comesRead More down. Girl, you got some bad luck with signs.