Mayor Joins Call for More Gun Controls

Mayor Lou La Monte takes part in writing a letter to President Barack Obama.

In the aftermath of the tragedy in Newtown, Conn. that resulted in the death of 20 children and six adults, Mayor Lou La Monte found himself online, looking at the website "Mayors Against Illegal Guns."

"That kind of issue isn’t really big here in Malibu," La Monte told Malibu Patch. "If it happened in a place like Newtown, it could happen anywhere."

La Monte began to look at the list of mayors who had already signed up across the country and saw several familiar names, including Santa Barbara Mayor Helene Schneider and West Hollywood Mayor Jeffrey Prang. 

"So I joined," La Monte said. The next day he received an email. 

"It said, 'We want to have a conference call in one hour because we need to react to this situation,'" La Monte said, adding that he knew he had to be invovled.

"The roll call of mayors that were on there was just astounding. Names from every state you can imagine," he said.

During the call, La Monte said he helped define the issues outlined in the letter calling for stricted controls on guns.

"It was an incredible group effort. It was amazing how quickly it galvanized people," La Monte said.

Mainly, what spurred him was the ability to jump in and take action.

"I thought we should be part of this. This is a problem. Everybody should be part of the solution," he said.

The group, which includes more than 750 mayors nationwide, is led by New York City Mayor Michael Bloomberg and Boston Mayor Thomas M. Menino.

The letter read, in part, "As mayors, we are charged with keeping our communities safe. But too many of us have sat with mothers and fathers of children killed with guns. Twenty-four children enrolled in public schools in your hometown of Chicago were shot to death just last year.

At the moving memorial service on Sunday evening, you said: 'If there is even one step we can take to save another child or another parent or another town from the grief that has visited Tucson and Aurora and Oak Creek and Newtown and communities from Columbine to Blacksburg before that – then surely we have an obligation to try.'”

In the letter, dated Dec. 19, 2012, the mayors ask the President to do seven things. They are:

  • Require every gun buyer to pass a criminal background check: Background checks are the only systematic way to stop felons, domestic abusers and other dangerous people from buying firearms. These checks are instantaneous and highly effective. Since its inception, the National Instant Criminal Background Check System (NICS) has blocked firearms purchases at licensed dealerships by millions of individuals who are barred by federal law from owning them.
  • Get high capacity rifles and ammunition magazines off our streets: Military-style weapons and high capacity ammunition magazines have no appropriate civilian or sporting function. They are designed to kill large numbers of people quickly. They are also disproportionately used to kill law enforcement officers; approximately one out of five law enforcement officers slain in the line of duty is killed with assault weapons.
  • Make gun trafficking a federal crime: Today, there is no clear and effective statute making gun trafficking a crime. Prosecutors are instead forced to rely on a weak law prohibiting engaging in the business of selling guns without a federal license, which carries the same punishment as trafficking chicken or livestock. As a result, according to the Justice Department’s Inspector General, U.S. Attorneys decline to prosecute 25 percent of those cases while declining only 9 percent of drug conspiracy cases. 
  • Appoint an ATF director: The Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms & Explosives (ATF), the federal agency responsible for enforcing our gun laws, has gone without a confirmed director for more than six years. During that time, criminals and those with serious mental illness have been able to take advantage of insufficient enforcement of existing federal gun laws, and an estimated 72,000 Americans have been murdered with guns. In 2011, for the first time in over a decade, more police officers were shot to death in the line of duty than were killed in automobile accidents.
  • Prosecute prohibited purchasers who attempt to buy firearms, ammunition or high-capacity magazines: The Justice Department should vigorously prosecute felons and other prohibited purchasers who fail gun background checks. In 2009, the Federal Bureau of Investigation referred more than 71,000 such cases to ATF, but U.S. Attorneys ultimately prosecuted only 77 of them. Prosecuting these offenders is a goal broadly supported by our coalition and the National Rifle Association.
  • Require federal agencies to report records to NICS: The NICS Improvement Act of 2007 requires federal agencies to submit mental health, substance abuse and other records that prohibit a person from owning a gun to NICS. However, few agencies comply. In October 2011, the FBI provided data to MAIG on reporting by 60 federal agencies. Of those 60 agencies, 52 had given zero mental health records to NICS. Although total federal agency reporting of mental health records increased by ten percent between March and October 2011, to 143,579, the vast majority of those records had been submitted by one agency, the Department of Veterans Affairs. Even fewer federal agencies are reporting drug abusers. Only three agencies — the FBI, the U.S. Coast Guard, and the Court Services and Offenders Supervision Agency (CSOSA), the probation and parole services agency for the District of Columbia — have submitted any substance abuse records, and the vast majority of federal agencies, including the Drug Enforcement Administration, have not submitted a single substance abuse record. The president should issue an executive order requiring all federal agency heads to certify twice annually, in writing, to the U.S. Attorney General that their agency has submitted all relevant records to NICS.
  • Repeal remaining Tiahrt restrictions: While Mayors Against Illegal Guns and our law enforcement allies have made progress in relaxing the “Tiahrt restrictions,” which are riders to the federal budget that restrict access to federal gun data, some still remain. These remaining restrictions keep the public, particularly researchers and elected officials, in the dark about gun traffickers – specifically, who they are and how they operate. It also requires the FBI to destroy records of approved NICS background checks within 24 hours. That makes it harder to detect law-breaking dealers who fake their records, or to identify straw buyers who undergo the checks on behalf of someone who couldn’t pass.  The Tiahrt Amendments also say ATF can’t require dealers to inspect their inventory, which could reduce the tens of thousands of guns that go missing or are stolen each year. Finally, the police and other law enforcement agencies that get trace data can’t use it in license revocation proceedings or in civil litigation. The administration should repeal these restrictions in its next budget.

To read the full text of the letter, click here.

Linda Vallejo December 24, 2012 at 03:34 AM
Hans if you read my post you would realize that I made no such statement that US should be compared to low income countries, nor gave that impression. What I stated was that Frank's report was incomplete & I quoted the rest of the report. The title of the report was U.S. #1 in gun violence. They then proceeded to disect this report on different levels and countries. You should read the whole report before you assume anything. You are an intelligent journalist & I am sure that you collect ALL the facts in order to present a comprehensive understanding based on the WHOLE report. If you are collecting information, you cannot pick & choose parts of the stat report to make it fit your slant. Frank only presented half the report. That is all I am stating - no need to make a ridiculous assumption based nothing I said. Please reread my post if you cannot remember what I stated. A huge word count means nothing unless it is loaded with Facts. A small word count means nothing if it contains incomplete information.
Ann Tomkins December 25, 2012 at 06:01 PM
Banning military style assault rifles is not an attack on the second amendment. These certainly were not the types of weapons that the founders were considering when writing the Constitution. I seriously doubt that the Supreme Court would interpret the Constitution as prohibiting reasonable regulations on these weapons.
Ann Tomkins December 25, 2012 at 06:04 PM
Now you're advocating abolishing the 1st amendment?
Dilair Nafoosi December 30, 2012 at 12:30 AM
If disarming the citizens makes violent crimes go down, why, oh why, is there not one example of an american city in which gun restrictions have led to a drop in crimes? Why are the three cities with the worst crime rates - Washington D.C., Chicago, and New York City - have the most gun control? Why are people swayed by arguments made by traitors like Piers Morgan and Soledad O'Brien who know NOTHING ABOUT GUNS including not knowing the difference between auto and semi-auto? How bad must things get before people turn off the celebrities,turn off the sports, and turn off the TV mind control and start thinking for themselves? When will people realize the first gun control laws were to prevent African Americans from owning firearms? When will people realize that those who give up liberty for security will lose both and deserve neither?
Arthur Christopher Schaper December 30, 2012 at 12:49 AM
Linda: Thank you for sharing this statistic. This nonsensical reform called "gun control" does not control guns at all, except for law-abiding citizens who are trained to control themselves and their firearms without intervention from the state. When Washington D.C.'s gun ban was scrapped by the Supreme Court, the murder rate declined. If our politicians will not listen to reason or reality, then we have the responsibility of making them listen, or getting rid of them so that our leaders will enact laws to protect our kids.


More »
Got a question? Something on your mind? Talk to your community, directly.
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors.What's on your mind?What's on your mind?Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell somethingPost something
See more »