Locals Speak Out on Environmental Impact of Planned Rancho Malibu Hotel

During a two-hour hearing, more than 50 people provided input on what they want included in a draft environmental report on the project.

More than 50 Malibu residents blasted plans for the proposed Rancho Malibu Hotel Wednesday and called on the city to look at the bigger picture of the potential impact on the Civic Center area and the future of Malibu.

The hearing was meant to gather input for a draft environmental report, which will be prepared and eventually opened up to more comment by as early as this summer.

Dan Gira, a consultant from AMEC who is preparing the draft EIR, led the hearing, which at times grew heated as speakers highlighted worries over traffic, public safety, wastewater and cultural resources.

"We’re aware there is a substantial amount of proposed development, especially in the Civic Center area. There are a number projects that are pending. We will be paying special attention to the cumulative effect, especially from this project," Gira said.

One of the project's developers, Richard Weintraub, said he believes the project will be the single largest economic generators in the city's history, but he declined to give specifics.

"We’re not looking to hide anything here. We’re not here to disrespect anything here ... I have fought like hell to hold on to this property," Weintraub said.

He added that he understands the concerns about traffic, public safety and water.

"I remember that traffic in the summer since I can remember has always been gridlocked. In the 50s it was gridlocked in August and it doesn’t have that much to do with the hotel," Weintraub said.

The hearing also sought to gather comments on whether the draft EIR should outline the project’s potential alternatives, including:

  • The construction of a garden hotel, which would reduce the number of condominiums and increase the number of rooms in the main hotel.
  • Decrease the size of the spa, retail and other facilities.
  • Use the area for a commercial shopping complex.

Before public comment portion of the meeting started, Hans Laetz, a journalist and recent city council candidate, called the notice of preparation for the public scoping meeting into question.

"This time table beginning with this meeting is rushed and inappropriate," Laetz said.

He called on the city to take its time with the project so that locals have a chance to weigh in.

Comments can be made on what should be included in the draft EIR until June 4.

Cultural Resources

Jo Ruggles expressed concerns about the potential cultural resources on the site and impacts to traffic locally and regionally.

David Paul Dominguez, who expressed affiliation with the Chumash, said that the tribe should be involved.

"It's cultural sensitivity to us Chumash people, that is the last area on that bluff point overlooking that main village site," Dominguez said.

Gira said several studies have been completed on the cultural resources, and that an additional one is in the works.

Mati Waiya, who was recently appointed to the Native American Cultural Resources Advisory Committee, also expressed concern.

"Malibu needs to wake up and respect and honor the regulations of Chumash. Our dead are under your home. Thousands of them are buried here," Waiya said. "We have to stand together on this. We’re in it together. This is our home and we’ve got to take care of it."

Gira thanked all speakers for their comments.

"We will give every due respect to the Native American community," Gira said.

Public Safety

Jae Flora-Katz said that she is concerned about the impact the hotel could have on traffic during an evacuation because of a fire.

"It is extremely dangerous," Flora-Katz said.

Gira said he will be contacting the fire department as part of the study.


Susan Tellem said she wants water issues investigated.

"I think we have to look at water and traffic and public safety impact," Tellem said.

Former City Councilman Jefferson Wagner said he does not think the project's proposed 500,000 gallon water tank is enough to protect the property and nearby areas during an emergency.

"You’re looking at the potential of a 3 million tank for a project of this size," Wagner siad.


Several residents also mentioned the issue of how to deal with the amount of wastewater from the proposed project.

Malibu Planning Commissioner John Mazza said he wants the EIR to include up-to-date numbers of how much water the city is allowed to discharge.

“Is the EIR going to address the fact that No. 1 where do they get the water and No. 2 how do they get rid of it? How does it affect the ability to develop other [areas]?” Mazza said.

Gira said he has personally read the city's staff reports on the proposed wastewater treatment center, and will include those questions and more in the study.


Several people also asked for the impact of traffic to be analyzed, especially in light of the large number of proposed development coming to Malibu, including Whole Foods, the addition of an extension campus and other projects.

Steve Uhring said he wants to make sure current technology is used to generate accurate traffic counts.

"You’re going to create a parking lot in the Civic Center," Uhring said.

Andy Lyon said he wants a bigger picture traffic study.

"I think the city of Malibu needs to do one major traffic study for all of these projects right now," Lyon said.

Gira said the city is considering a traffic report currently. Story poles, which are used to assess the visual impact of a project, are expected to be put up soon, he added.

Many more residents spoke during the two-hour hearing. If we left you out, feel free to leave your perspective in the comments.

J. Flo May 17, 2012 at 11:13 PM
Terry, "it is the cumulative effect." BINGO.
Hans Laetz May 18, 2012 at 12:41 AM
At the meeting, the public learned of major public safety dangers caused by the anticipated Proposal’s layout: An emergency vehicle access road will loop around nearly all of the Project. This will cause two dead-end fire roads with a major gap between them at the eastern end of the complex. There would be no emergency vehicular access between the northern and southern emergency access roads. Both emergency access roads would be accessed only by driveways immediately adjacent to the only public vehicular or pedestrian entrance, on Malibu Canyon Road. No fire equipment access, or pedestrian evacuation routes, are possible or down the steep slopes or the retaining walls creating the castle walls to the north, east and south of the complex. The entire building complex is essence has one entrance and exit point, which is within 150 feet of the busiest (by traffic count) intersection in the City of Malibu, at PCH/Malibu Cyn. This intersection is the junction of all three of the only practical emergency equipment access points into the the City of Malibu, and the intersection sits between the hotel and all possible fire stations within 15 miles. And, the hotel site has burned twice in the past 20 years, and eight times since 1945 (according to USFS records). Madness.
Jamie Ottilie May 21, 2012 at 08:03 PM
I think it is pretty simple - we - the people of Malibu - need to communicate to OUR city council - that we will not accept any amendments, Zoning variances, changes to the LCP, etc for this property. Either build something that fits within the existing laws or don't build it. I don't understand why it is so hard for our city government understand this and to message this to ALL commercial property developers. They have a right to developer their land but ONLY within the existing laws.
Hans Laetz May 21, 2012 at 09:51 PM
None of these projects are possible without variances. We have a very strong General Plan and LCP but the city has a demonstrated record of playing fast and loose with variances. The "Trancas Supersize" project was granted variances for everything they sought: parking, front and side setbacks, grading, height. 4-1 vote at planning, 5-0 vote at council. State law is very simple. A variance can be granted only "when, because of special circumstances applicable to the property, including size, shape, topography, location or surroundings, the strict application of the zoning ordinance deprives such property of privileges enjoyed by other property in the vicinity and under identical zoning classification." The track record is that we can't trust our own City Hall to hold firm on saying NO to these overwhelming developer variances. City Hall cannot put out a preliminary report that says a project with a 55 percent overshoot for grading or height is feasible when it gets tons of variances -- it should put out a report that the project is not feasible because it could only be built with massive variances, which appear illegal. We need a citizens initiative. Voters should take control. It should be against the Malibu Municipal Code to grant any and all commercial variances beyond carefully defined, minor adjustments. That would put teeth into the General Plan.
Jamie Ottilie May 21, 2012 at 11:07 PM
it isn't a bad idea Hans - I don't suppose binding Referendum works at the city level? I am certain we could get something like that to pass a public vote!


More »
Got a question? Something on your mind? Talk to your community, directly.
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors.What's on your mind?What's on your mind?Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell somethingPost something
See more »